At the panel, Tristan Harris talked about the experience of visiting a museum with a friend at your elbow, explaining the backstory of each painting. Asa form of context-provision that’s pretty ideal. But what’s important about it is that this is your friend’s voice.

Voice wasn’t really addressed by anyone at the panel. Matt asked, where does Wikipedia fall down? And this is one area: by design, it lacks personal voice.

So much of contextual info is provided as footnotes, aftermatter, backstory. As such it lacks personality and ends up being easily ignored by the people who need it most.

The power of everyone’s favorite example, the This American Life “Pool of Money” piece, lies in the strong personal voice its storytelling uses.

How do we give the frame of a story the compelling personality of a great storyteller’s voice? We need to make the footnotes sing and dance. The idea of “object-oriented storytelling” is great, but we have to figure out how the storyteller’s voice survives the transformation into separate objects.